en
Paul Strathern

Socrates: Philosophy in an Hour

Повідомити про появу
Щоб читати цю книжку, завантажте файл EPUB або FB2 на Букмейт. Як завантажити книжку?
  • Nikolai C.цитує4 роки тому
    As Socrates wrote nothing down, it seems only fair to begin with a quotation that explains why he did this:

    Knowing nothing, what could I write down?

    He goes on to explain:

    Once there was an ancient Egyptian god called Theuth. He invented numbers, geometry, astronomy, dice, and writing. One day Theuth went to see Thamus, the King of Upper Egypt, and began to show him all he had invented. When Theuth reached the alphabet, he explained: “This is an invention which will greatly improve the wisdom and memory of your people.” But the king replied: “O ingenious Theuth, your alphabet will have exactly the opposite effect from the one you claim. As soon as Egyptians begin to rely upon written wisdom, they will stop using their memory and call things to mind not by using their own internal resources, as they should, but by using these external signs.
  • Nikolai C.цитує4 роки тому
    . He would begin by asking his adversary to define the subject under discussion – which might be anything from the nature of justice to the method of becoming a general. Whether sublime or ridiculous, the subject was given the same treatment. This was the great innovation of the dialectic: it was a tool that could be applied to anything. Having elicited a definition of the subject, Socrates would then proceed to pick holes in it, and in the process a better definition would be achieved. In this way he advanced from particular examples to those with more general application, finally arriving at the universal truth.
  • Nikolai C.цитує4 роки тому
    He would begin by asking his adversary to define the subject under discussion – which might be anything from the nature of justice to the method of becoming a general. Whether sublime or ridiculous, the subject was given the same treatment
  • Nikolai C.цитує4 роки тому
    He would begin by asking his adversary to define the subject under discussion
  • Nikolai C.цитує4 роки тому
    Socrates saw the soul as being much more like the conscious personality: an entity that could be judged clever or stupid, good or bad – that is, something for which we are morally responsible
  • Nikolai C.цитує4 роки тому
    One way of explaining this is to use the image of a plaster cast being made out of a mould
  • Nikolai C.цитує4 роки тому
    According to Socrates, particular objects receive their qualities by “participating” in the ideas from which they derive
  • Nikolai C.цитує4 роки тому
    Socrates would seek to clarify the debate by starting from first principles. This meant defining the basic concepts upon which his adversary’s ideas rested, exposing inconsistencies, and particularly pointing out the consequences of such ideas
  • Alejandro Casas Ibáñezцитує4 роки тому
    He goes on to explain:
    Once there was an ancient Egyptian god called Theuth. He invented numbers, geometry, astronomy, dice, and writing. One day Theuth went to see Thamus, the King of Upper Egypt, and began to show him all he had invented. When Theuth reached the alphabet, he explained: “This is an invention which will greatly improve the wisdom and memory of your people.” But the king replied: “O ingenious Theuth, your alphabet will have exactly the opposite effect from the one you claim. As soon as Egyptians begin to rely upon written wisdom, they will stop using their memory and call things to mind not by using their own internal resources, as they should, but by using these external signs.”
    – Plato, Phaedo, 274, 275
  • Alejandro Casas Ibáñezцитує4 роки тому
    The precise outlines of this prison may still be seen, one hundred yards southwest of the present ruins of the Agora
fb2epub
Перетягніть файли сюди, не більш ніж 5 за один раз