Ми використовуємо файли cookie для покращення якості роботи сайту Bookmate та наших рекомендацій.
Для отримання додаткової інформації ознайомтеся з нашою Політикою щодо файлів cookie.
Прийняти все cookies
Налаштування файлів cookie
Svg Vector Icons : http://www.onlinewebfonts.com/icon Щось трапилось. Спробуйте ще раз.
Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion, Роберт Чалдини
en
Роберт Чалдини

Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion

Повідомити про появу
Щоб читати цю книжку, завантажте файл EPUB або FB2 на Букмейт. Як завантажити книжку?
Influence, the classic book on persuasion, explains the psychology of why people say “yes”—and how to apply these understandings. Dr. Robert Cialdini is the seminal expert in the rapidly expanding field of influence and persuasion. His thirty-five years of rigorous, evidence-based research along with a three-year program of study on what moves people to change behavior has resulted in this highly acclaimed book.
You'll learn the six universal principles, how to use them to become a skilled persuader—and how to defend yourself against them. Perfect for people in all walks of life, the principles of Influence will move you toward profound personal change and act as a driving force for your success.
Some images that appeared in the print edition of this book are unavailable in the electronic edition due to rights reasons.
більше
Ця книжка зараз недоступна
416 паперових сторінок
Рік виходу видання
2009
Уже прочитали? Що скажете?
👍👎

Враження

  • Anastasia Gaydashenkoділиться враженням6 років тому
    👍Раджу
    💡Пізнавальна

  • b9281010009ділиться враженням9 років тому
    💡Пізнавальна

Цитати

  • njjjjhgyjцитує3 місяці тому
    First, although the familiarity produced by contact usually leads to greater liking, the opposite occurs if the contact carries distasteful experiences with it.
  • njjjjhgyjцитує2 роки тому
    We will use the actions of others to decide on proper behavior for ourselves, especially when we view those others as similar to ourselves
  • njjjjhgyjцитує2 роки тому
    that, for the emergency victim, the idea of “safety in numbers” may often be completely wrong. It might be that someone in need of emergency aid would have a better chance of survival if a single bystander, rather than a crowd, was present. To test this unusual thesis, Darley, Latané, their students and colleagues performed a systematic and impressive program of research that produced a clear set of findings. Their basic procedure was to stage emergency events that were observed either by a single individual or by a group of people. They then recorded the number of times the emergency victim received help under those circumstances.
    In their first experiment, a New York college student who appeared to be having an epileptic seizure received help 85 percent of the time when there was a single bystander present but only 31 percent of the time with five bystanders present. With almost all the single bystanders helping, it becomes difficult to argue that ours is “The Cold Society”
    where no one cares for suffering others. Obviously it was something about the presence of other bystanders that reduced helping to shameful levels.
    Other studies have examined the importance of social proof in causing widespread witness “apathy.” They have done so by planting within a group of witnesses to a possible emergency people who are rehearsed to act as if no emergency were occurring. For instance, in another New York—based experiment, 75 percent of lone individuals who observed smoke seeping from under a door reported the leak; however, when similar leaks were observed by three-person groups, the smoke was reported only 38 percent of the time. The smallest number of bystanders took action, though, when the three-person groups

На полицях

fb2epub
Перетягніть файли сюди, не більш ніж 5 за один раз